On one hand, it is not fair that a family has less time to talk about the loss they have experienced, simply because the person who victimized their beloved son, daughter, mother, or father happened to be below the age of eighteen. On the other hand, perpetrators do not have to confront the consequences of their crimes: they are shielded from learning about the full effects of the tragedy they have caused. Humes even implies that this makes it easier for prosecutors to cut deals with juveniles, since the prosecutors do not have to suffer the uncomfortable and impolitic sight of the family in court, talking about their tragedy.
Even for more minor offenses, victims are 're-victimized' by the system -- because of lax policing and procedures juvenile cases are frequently dismissed because witnesses do not show up and are not tracked down and found. Because it is a juvenile crime, even the representatives of law and order -- the police -- show little interest in ensuring that a case is presented in a complete fashion before a court of law (Humes 132).
Is the juvenile court system an effective means for deterring juvenile delinquency?
One of the most horrific aspects of Humes' narrative is the degree to which cost considerations affect the administration of justice in juvenile court. For example, forensic evidence such...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now